Optimising investments from elephant tourist revenues in the Maputo Elephant Reserve, Mozambique
By CostBenefit on Nov 29, 2007 | In General, Africa, Academic Study/Journal Article, Economic Development and Green Jobs, Endangered Species, Regulatory Analysis, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Environmental Economics / Ecological Economics, Costs and Benefits | 1 feedback »
Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2006.11.002
Summary: Private enterprises are active in conservation initiatives in Africa. Some of these enterprises have long-term licences for the development of conservation areas. The motivation of these organisations to participate in conservation is ultimately determined by the economic output of their activities. An electric fence is being constructed in the Maputo Elephant Reserve, Mozambique. A costs-benefit analysis was carried out, in order to assist in the optimisation of the management activities of the elephant population, based on elephant population size, fence costs, crop raid costs, elephant poaching, and benefits derived from tourism (game-viewing and hunting). Tourist numbers increased with increasing elephant density through a concave utility function. Optimal harvest/hunting strategies were calculated from optimal control theory, using dynamic optimisation (Pontryagin's Maximum Principle). Poaching and raid costs could be compared to fence construction costs at different elephant population sizes. Costs generated through elephant poaching and elephant crop raid costs were higher than fence construction costs at a population size over 100. Elephant hunting was a less favourable activity, economically and ecologically, than elephant viewing, due to the large game-viewing profits per elephant. Only if the licence fee increases from US$6500 to 28,500 would hunting become attractive, although ecological and economical constraints would probably prevent the development of hunting activities in the area. The assumed resource price of elephant (US$5000) was lower than the marginal value derived from tourism, indicating that elephants should be bought until the maximum stocking rate is reached.
Keywords: Cost benefit analysis; Crop damage; Fence; Game-viewing; Hunting; Poaching
by W.F. de Boer 1, J.D. Stigter 2 and C.P. Ntumi 3
1. Resource Ecology Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands; Telephone: +31 317 482691; fax: +31 317 419000.
2. Systems and Control Group, Wageningen University, Bornsesteeg 59, 6708 PD Wageningen, The Netherlands
3. Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, CP 257 Maputo, Mozambique
Journal for Nature Conservation via Elsevier Science Direct www.ScienceDirect.com
Volume 15, Issue 4; December 11, 2007, Pages 225-236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2006.11.002
1 comment
adbot
New Phaser 8560 Solid Ink technology from Xerox. Better Prints, lower printing costs & less Ink Cartridge Waste. http://www.concordsupplies.com/find.html?search=manufacturer&search=model&value=Xerox&value=Phaser+8560
Leave a comment
| « John Whitehead's Holiday shopping at TerraPass (from www.env-econ.net Environmental Economics: Economists on Environmental and Natural Resources: News, Opinion, and Analysis | Ethanol's Bottom Line » |
