Showing posts with label Floods. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Floods. Show all posts

Thursday, September 1, 2011

New report identifies how impacts of climate change to water supplies & waterways will affect U.S. cities - In record year for storms and drought, provides a resource for cities nationwide preparing for sea level rise, increased rain, flooding, drought and drinking water impacts

http://www.nrdc.org/media/2011/110727.asp
As the nation grapples with a record year for storms, drought and weather-related devastation, a new report released today by the Natural Resources Defense Council reveals climate change is leaving American cities open to a range of water-related vulnerabilities – from drought to sea level rise and increased rainfall – regardless of region or size. The report looks at how communities facing these new extremes are trying to protect their water supplies and waterways.

“This report makes clear that some of the first, most profound and far-reaching impacts of climate change are water-related, affecting the water we drink, fish, and swim in,” said Michelle Mehta, an attorney for NRDC’s Water Program and a principal author of the report. “In the future, we can expect increased violent storms, drought and rising seas, so communities nationwide, regardless of size, should get plans up and running to reduce their unique vulnerabilities and prepare for impacts.”

The report, “Thirsty for Answers: Preparing for the Water-related Impacts of Climate Change in American Cities,” found that climate change will impact water supplies and waterways in communities across the country, with geography often determining the specific effects. For the first time, this peer-reviewed report has compiled the results of more than 75 scientific studies, data generated by government agencies, and information gathered by other nonprofit organizations to analyze how the impacts of climate change on water supplies and waterways could affect 12 target cities: Boston, Massachusetts; Chicago, Illinois; Homer, Alaska; Los Angeles, California; Miami, Florida, and the Florida Keys; New Orleans, Louisiana; New York, New York; Norfolk, Virginia; Phoenix, Arizona; Wan Francisco, California; Seattle, Washington and St. Louis, Missouri.

The report provides a snapshot of projected climate change impacts in regions across the country: Rising sea levels threaten vital infrastructure and saltwater intrusion to freshwater supplies in cities on the East, West and Gulf Coasts. Severe storms in the Midwest and East Coast are likely to become more intense and more frequent, causing floods and erosion, and threatening drinking water quality. In the West, a combination of increased temperatures, decreased precipitation and less snowpack contributes to a future shortage of water supply for people and aquatic life. More specifically scientific studies reveal a range of possible impacts under various carbon emission scenarios:
  • Rising Seas: Coastal cities examined in the report, such as Miami, Norfolk, New Orleans, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Seattle are threatened by flooding and storm surges due to rising sea levels. For example, data show the very existence of the Florida Keys is at stake, with 38 percent at risk of inundation in the most optimistic scenario. Conservative projections also suggests the California coast could see a 12- to 18-inch rise in sea levels and the coastline of Seattle a 3-to 22-inch rise relative to levels recorded in 2000.

    Saltwater intrusion also could become more common in coastal communities as a result of this sea level rise, threatening freshwater supplies, according to data compiled. In New York City, for example, saltwater is expected to journey farther up the Hudson and Delaware Rivers during high tides, two of the region’s major sources for freshwater supply. Also, the salinity problem already facing California’s Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta is likely to increase, threatening the quality and reliability of the freshwater supply used by millions of Californians for drinking water as well as the region’s heavy agriculture industry.

  •  Increased Storms and Flooding: Research finds the Midwest is expected to experience more frequent and intense storms, contributing to the type of recent heavy flooding along the Mississippi River. The frequency of very heavy rainfall in Chicago, for example, is expected to increase by 50 percent in the next 30 years, which without infrastructural improvements is likely to increase the number of combined sewer overflows (CSO) that send untreated sewage and storm water into the Chicago River and Lake Michigan.

    Increased rainfall along the Atlantic is predicted to cause significant flooding as a result of tropical storms and nor’easters. In New York City, 100-year floods could occur every 30 to 55 years by 2050. Such flooding increases the risk of damage to vital low-lying infrastructure in New York, as well as critical naval and civilian ports in Norfolk. Heavier rainfall in the Midwest is likely to cause increased stream flows due in part to saturated soils, threatening levees in cities like St. Louis.  
  • A Drier West: The report describes rising temperatures, less rainfall and decreased snowpack in the U.S. West. As a result, without proper management, water supplies could be seriously threatened in regions such as Los Angeles, Seattle and Phoenix. Slight temperature changes could cause irregular stream flow patterns and lead to unseasonal snowpack melt outside of the dry season when the runoff is most needed, the data revealed. For example, the loss of spring snowpack in California’s Sierra Nevada mountain range is highly likely, and a worst case scenario estimates stream flows in Southern California decreasing by as much as 41 percent.

    Warmer air also could cause precipitation to fall as rain in areas where it traditionally has fallen as snow, such as in watersheds that supply the populations of Seattle and Phoenix, causing decreases and even disappearance of snowpack. Such a scenario would pose serious challenges for local water supply managers, particularly during the summer months, as they attempt to balance human demand for water with needs for water supplies for hydroelectricity and wildlife habitats.

  • Decreased Water Quality: Data cited in the report point to the many negative effects rising carbon dioxide concentrations are having on water quality. For example, higher dissolved carbon dioxide concentrations, warmer water, and increased runoff could cause increased occurrences of harmful algal blooms in the Chesapeake Bay and around Seattle. The blooms can result in fish kills and cause shellfish to become contaminated with potent natural toxins, causing illness in humans who consume them.
Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations and warmer waters are detrimental to the health of the coral reefs off the coast of Miami and the Florida Keys, and acidification of the waters in Puget Sound near Seattle threatens shellfish, a vital contributor to the local economy.

The compiled local data are cause for concern, and the report describes various steps these cities are taking to become more resilient to the effects of climate change, providing examples of steps that communities across the country should consider.
...
The complete report is available online from NRDC at: http://www.nrdc.org/water/thirstyforanswers.asp.
...
More frequent flooding episodes associated with storm events, exacerbated by sea level rise, would adversely affect major transportation arteries, including highways and rail and air transportation, and the viability of waterfront structures.... Increased flooding would also affect streets, basements, sewer systems,  communications equipment, and electrical support facilities such as relays, wiring, and switches associated with fiber-optic cable. In total, by 2070 the greater New York City metro area is projected to have $1.7  trillion to $2.1 trillion in property at risk from coastal flooding due to storm surges and damage from high  winds.
...
If current growth and land use practices remain unchanged while relative sea levels rise 3.3 feet (1 meter) by the end of the century, a 100-year storm surge could cost the city of  Boston about $36 billion (in year 2000 dollars) in damages to residential, commercial, and industrial structures and in emergency response costs. Homes built in the area’s 100-and 500-year floodplains could see flood damage of $7,000 to $18,000 each. Over the course of the 21st century, river flooding could affect twice as many properties at twice the overall cost of past floods.
...
Miami is no stranger to severe weather, particularly hurricanes: Hurricane Andrew caused $26.5 billion in damage in 1992, and Hurricane Wilma caused more than $1 billion in damage in 2005.
...
To counter the impacts of beach erosion, sand renourishment may have to occur more frequently. However, this labor-intensive process comes at a price: Between 1976 and 1981, a beach renourishment project that  replenished a 10-mile stretch of beach to a width of about 100 feet cost $64 million.
...
Greater Miami currently has more than $400 billion in property value at risk from coastal flooding, and that value could rise to $3.5 trillion by 2070.
...
Sea level rise (estimates for the region are 3 to 5 feet, or 0.9 to 1.5 meters, by 21003) delivers a one-two punch to the Keys, owing to their low elevation (an average of 4 to 7 feet, or 1.2 to 2.1 meters, above current sea level) and their high water-to-land ratio (any point on land is within 4 miles of water). Estimates of the potential loss of land area in the Keys range from 38 percent (at a value of $11 billion) to 92 percent ($35 billion).
...
Rising seas will likely wipe out a significant portion of the coastal wetlands in the Mississippi River Deltaic  Plain, where wetland loss rates are already among the highest in the world. Mississippi River flood-protection levees, some in place since the 18th century, rob the surrounding wetlands of replenishing seasonal sediments that would help counteract natural and man-made subsidence and erosion. Additional human activities such as the dredging of ship channels, oil and gas production, and the siting of industrial facilities exacerbate wetland loss. Wetland vegetation thrives in shallow waters but cannot survive as water depth and salinity increase. Wetlands without vegetation lose their ability to damp the energy of storm surges and waves, thus increasing the likelihood of flooding further inland in places—like metropolitan New Orleans—that have historically depended on these wetlands for protection.

Without inputs of sediment, an additional 3,900 to 5,200 square miles of wetlands will be under water by the end of the 21st century. If the impacts of relative sea level rise on wetlands are not checked, metropolitan New Orleans could eventually sit on land almost completely surrounded by the open waters of the Gulf of Mexico.  Loss of Louisiana’s coastal wetlands not only would be a loss of natural flood protection but would impact the vast array of plants and animals that they support, many of which are tied to economic activity including fishing, timber, agriculture, tourism, and recreation. The combined value of infrastructure and biological productivity associated with Louisiana’s wetlands exceeds $100 billion.
...
The Pacific Institute report also details facilities and property at risk from a 100-year flood with a 55-inch sea level rise in San Francisco.... The current replacement value of buildings and contents vulnerable to a 100-year flood in counties in the San Francisco Bay Area is $31 billion; with a 55-inch rise in sea level that figure more than doubles, to $64 billion.
 ...
In the Bay Area counties, a total of more than 640 miles of new levees, raised levees, or seawalls, at a cost of almost $5.3 billion (in 2000 dollars), would be needed to protect against flooding in the event of a 55-inch rise in sea level. Maintaining these additional structures would require annual expenses on the order of a tenth of the capital cost. While armoring the coastline would save lives and property, it disrupts natural processes that are also of value.
...
Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) www.NRDC.org
Press Release dated July 26, 2011 (pre Irene)

Sunday, May 8, 2011

CoreLogic Storm Surge Report Shows More Than $300 Billion In Residential Property Damage Exposure in Ten Major U.S. Cities

http://tiny.cc/gbx17
Long Island and Miami Could Suffer Highest Potential Loss to Hurricane Storm Surge Flooding

On May 3, 2011 CoreLogic (NYSE: CLGX) ... released a report detailing potential exposure to storm surge property damage in ten major urban areas along the U.S. Gulf and Atlantic Coasts. The 2011 CoreLogic Storm Surge Report revealed hurricane-driven storm surge flooding could cause billions in damage to residential structures in 2011. CoreLogic developed the Storm Surge Report to enhance understanding of the heightened risk that storm surge waves pose to homes located in areas prone to tropical storms. The report complements the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood zone information to provide a complete picture of potential damage exposure at the property level. Many properties located outside designated flood zones are still at risk for storm surge damage.

Storm surge is triggered primarily by the high winds and low pressure associated with hurricanes, which cause water to amass inside a storm as it moves across the ocean and release as a powerful rush over land when the hurricane moves on shore. In addition to the property damage and lives lost to flooding, the speed and force associated with storm surge waves can significantly increase geographic and economic impact in hurricane disaster areas. The data is useful for insurance providers and financial services companies in order to understand the potential damage exposure for homes that do not fall into designated flood zones and, therefore, likely do not carry flood insurance, but are still at risk of storm surge.

“The local flood zones defined by FEMA in high-risk coastal regions provide a great deal of exposure data for homes in the path of flood waters, but understanding the additional layer of risk posed by a storm surge is critical for homeowners, emergency response teams, insurance companies and many others to plan and prepare for natural catastrophes,” said Dr. Howard Botts, executive vice president and director of database development for CoreLogic Spatial Solutions. “As the report shows, in many cases, homes exposed to potential storm-surge inundation are located outside of designated flood zones, and those homeowners need to be aware of their vulnerability to severe damage and property losses.”

CoreLogic generated the Storm Surge Report using the company’s comprehensive parcel database. After identifying the top ten high-risk urban areas based on the probability of a hurricane striking, vulnerability to storm surge given on-shore and off-shore geographic attributes and population density, CoreLogic identified all residential properties within a predicted storm surge area and analyzed it against the associated property value of each home. The analysis divided property valuations first by hurricane category, then again within each region by ZIP code. The final results show the current value of all residential properties exposed to potential storm surge damage, and allow for the comparison of properties at risk for storm-surge damage to those properties also located within a FEMA flood zone. Cities examined in the analysis include New Orleans, LA; Mobile, AL; Charleston, SC; Corpus Christi and Houston-Galveston, TX; Jacksonville, Tampa, and Miami-Dade, FL; Virginia Beach, VA and Long Island, NY.

Of the metro areas studied in the report, Long Island was found to have the highest exposure to risk, valued at $99 billion, followed by the Miami-Palm Beach region and Virginia Beach. Projected exposure to storm surge damage for the ten geographies is as follows:

Long Island, NY – $99 billion
Miami-Dade, FL – $44.9 billion
Virginia Beach, VA – $44.6 billion
New Orleans, LA – $39 billion
Tampa, FL – $27 billion
Houston, TX – $20 billion
Jacksonville, FL – $19.6 billion
Charleston, SC – $17.7 billion
Corpus Christi, TX – $4.7 billion
Mobile, AL – $3 billion

Other key findings include percent of homes located in flood and surge zones and total individual properties at risk in each geographic region. The report indicates the majority of homes at risk for storm surge damage within the ten metro areas are in fact located outside of FEMA-defined flood zones. For example, 87.4 percent of surge-inundation zone properties are not in a flood zone in Virginia Beach while only 12.2 percent of at-risk homes are positioned in both surge and flood zones. Among the densely populated coastal regions with the highest number of individual properties exposed to storm surge damage are Virginia Beach, with nearly 289,000 properties, New Orleans, with more than 278,000 properties and Tampa, with more than 277,000 homes at risk.

The 2011 CoreLogic Storm Surge Report also points out the effects of man-made mitigation efforts in the New Orleans metro area. According to the report, reconstruction efforts over the past six years, which included raising area levees, rebuilding flood walls and creating the massive Lake Borgne Surge Barrier, now provide a greater level of protection from storm surge destruction. Many homes previously designated in a high-risk surge zone now have a significantly lower chance of exposure to property damage.

“The important thing to remember is that though individual homeowners can greatly reduce hurricane wind damage with improvements to buildings and structural design, they are often powerless to mitigate the impact of storm surge and resulting saltwater flooding,” said Dr. Botts. “It’s a common misconception for homeowners to think that if they live outside of a FEMA flood zone they are safe from hurricane-driven storm surge flooding, when in reality their property is vulnerable to the most destructive natural flooding catastrophes that can occur alongside a tropical storm.”

This is the second annual Storm Surge Report that CoreLogic has produced. The methodology was recalibrated to provide a more robust analysis of potential damage and therefore, comparing the 2011 report with the 2010 report might lead to inaccurate comparisons.

For a complete copy of the 2011 CoreLogic Storm Surge Report, visit http://www.corelogic.com/Products/hazard-analytics.aspx

CoreLogic www.CoreLogic.com
Press Release dated May 3, 2011

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Weathering the Storm: Measuring Household Willingness-to-Pay for Risk-Reduction in Post-Katrina New Orleans

http://tinyurl.com/6gvqv75
Abstract: The city of New Orleans suffered extensive damage as a result of Hurricane Katrina. Katrina overwhelmed the natural and built environment, inundating the city. As rebuilding proceeds, decisions on investment in protective measures will include the choice of lines of defense and the storm severity that design criteria should meet. An exhaustive list of protective measures has been studied in planning documents such as the Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Technical Report (2009), with public comment solicited in town hall meetings. In this study we employ a different approach to examine public sentiment towards the selection and investment in protective measures. Our study utilizes a stated choice experiment with a stratified sample to investigate individuals’ willingness-to-pay for rebuilding New Orleans’ man-made storm defenses, restoring natural storm protection, and improving evacuation options through a modernized transportation system. We target residents of the New Orleans metropolitan area as well as other US citizens. Our results indicate that individuals are willing-to-pay for increased storm protection for New Orleans, but the allocation of these resources differs among residents of the New Orleans metro area and other US citizens.
...
Results suggest that levee flood protection designed to withstand a category 5 storm is the most salient rebuilding feature. New Orleans metro area residents are willing to pay (WTP) $301 per household for category 5 levee protection, while the average U.S. household is willing to pay more, an estimated $509. We speculate that this difference could reflect higher average income for the U.S. population relative to New Orleans residents, assuming flood protection is a normal good. Results of the combined model
indicate an average willingness-to-pay (WTP) of $449 per U.S. household for upgrading New Orleans levee system to withstand a Category 5 storm.


Surprisingly, WTP for coastal restoration was not statistically significant for the New Orleans or U.S. samples, but the combined model indicates an overall average economic value of $103 per household. We find evidence of significant variability in the utility attributable to coastal restoration across the U.S. and combined samples. A latent class model reveals that individuals that view coastal restoration as an important part of rebuilding New Orleans and have higher income are willing to pay $214 for coastal restoration, while those that do not see coastal restoration as important and have lower income are not willing to pay.
New Orleans metro area residents are willing to pay an estimated $137 per household for modernized transportation in the New Orleans metro area, while the average U.S. household is not willing to pay for this. Again, the latent class model reveals some differences in economic value across groups, with higher income U.S. households that view coastal restoration as important harboring a negative WTP for improvements in transportation. We speculate that this reflects a concern that improved infrastructure will encourage additional development in hazard prone areas like New Orleans. Nonetheless, results of the combined model indicate an average WTP of $103 per U.S. household for modernizing New Orleans’ transportation infrastructure.


by Craig Landry 1, Paul Hindsley 2, Okmyung Bin 1, Jamie B. Kruse 1, John C. Whitehead  3 and Kenneth Wilson
1. East Carolina University - Department of Economics
2. Eckerd College
3. Appalachian State University - Department of Economics
Southern Economic Journal via Southern Economic Association http://www.southerneconomic.org/
Volume 77, Issue 4; 2011; Pages 991-1013
http://econ.appstate.edu/RePEc/pdf/wp0918.pdf


Keywords: storm surge mitigation, conjoint analysis, willingness to pay, Hurricane Katrina, flood control, stated choice, rebuilding New Orleans, recovery