http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800912001383
by Ju-Yeon Kima, , James W. Mjeldeb, ,Tae-Kyun Kimc, ,Choong-Ki Leed, and Kyung-Mo Ahne,
a International Tourism Strategy Institute, Kyung Hee University, 1, Hoegi-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130–701, South Korea
b Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
c Department of Agricultural Economics, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 702-701, South Korea
d College of Hotel and Tourism, Kyung Hee University, 1, Hoegi-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130–701, South Korea Corresponding author. Tel.: + 82 2 961 9430; fax: + 82 2 964 2537
e Graduate school of Tourism, Kyung Hee University, 1, Hoegi-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130–701, South Korea
Abstract: Two
threads within the contingent valuation literature are potential biases
created by the hypothetical nature of the method and defining the
population to sample. To our knowledge, this is the first study to
combine these threads, namely examining how attempting to control for
hypothetical bias interacts with how the population is defined. Results
indicate controlling for hypothetical bias makes the two samples,
residents of Baengnyeong Island (where the spotted seal is located) and
the general South Korea population, more similar than if bias is not
corrected. Without correcting for bias, for example, residents'
willingness-to-pay for preservation of the seal is 33% higher than the
general population; however, after controlling for hypothetical bias
this percent decreases to 21%.
Highlights
►
Both hypothetical bias and sample definition effect WTP for
environmental goods.
► There appears to be an interaction between hypothetical bias and sample definitions.
► Controlling for hypothetical bias decreased differences between the two samples.
► There appears to be an interaction between hypothetical bias and sample definitions.
► Controlling for hypothetical bias decreased differences between the two samples.
a International Tourism Strategy Institute, Kyung Hee University, 1, Hoegi-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130–701, South Korea
b Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
c Department of Agricultural Economics, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 702-701, South Korea
d College of Hotel and Tourism, Kyung Hee University, 1, Hoegi-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130–701, South Korea Corresponding author. Tel.: + 82 2 961 9430; fax: + 82 2 964 2537
e Graduate school of Tourism, Kyung Hee University, 1, Hoegi-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130–701, South Korea
Volume 78, June 2012, Pages 123–131
Keywords: Willingness-to-pay; Contingent valuation method; spotted seal; Hypothetical bias; Sample selection
Keywords: Willingness-to-pay; Contingent valuation method; spotted seal; Hypothetical bias; Sample selection
No comments:
Post a Comment