Sunday, September 23, 2012

An analysis of costs of parabolic trough technology in India

Abstract: There is a global resurgence in solar thermal power across the world. This paper provides a transparent framework for calculating the cost of generated electricity from a concentrated solar power (CSP) plant and the internal rate of return on equity. The different factors contributing to the capital cost and generation cost of CSP technology have been discussed. The effect of variation of plant size, solar insolation and discount rate has been shown. India has launched the Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission (JNNSM) and plans to install 20 GW of grid connected solar power by 2022. An analysis of the bids received in the National Thermal Power Corporation’s Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Ltd. (NVVN) bidding process, indicates that successful companies have access to low interest capital (effective discount rate ranging from 6.3–12.2%). With the current generation cost of 11–12 Rs/kW h (24–25 US Cents/kW h), an achievable target for CSP in the future is likely to be 6.5–7 Rs/kW h (14–15 US Cents/kW h). This may be possible through reductions in solar field and power block costs combined with increases in collector and overall plant efficiency.

Highlights

► Framework for calculation of costs of parabolic trough technology.
► Parametric variation of factors affecting the economics of parabolic trough technology.
► Analysis of the NVVN reverse bidding process has been carried out
Full-size image (27 K) 
Fig. 1. Cumulative solar thermal power plant installations across the world.
Full-size image (64 K) 
Fig. 2. Factors for calculation of generation costs for solar thermal technology
Full-size image (62 K) 
Fig. 3. Calculation of IRR equity for solar thermal technology
Full-size image (22 K) 
Fig. 4. Trend in capital cost of CSP.
Full-size image (23 K) 
Fig. 6. Schematic of a parabolic trough based solar thermal power plant.
Full-size image (25 K) 
Fig. 7. Capital cost breakup for base case.
Full-size image (33 K) 
Fig. 8. Cost of generated electricity vs solar insolation.
Full-size image (26 K)
Fig. 9. Investment cost in Rs. Million/MWe vs solar insolation.
Full-size image (29 K) 
Fig. 10. Capital cost variation of solar power plants with storage
Full-size image (24 K) 
Fig. 11. Capital cost variation of solar power plants without storage.
Full-size image (23 K) 
Fig. 12. Cost of generation variation with plant size (with storage).
Full-size image (26 K) 
Fig. 13. Cost of generation variation with plant size (without storage).
Full-size image (25 K) 
Fig. 14. Cost of generation variation with discount rate.
Full-size image (22 K) 
Fig. 15. IRR equity vs interest rate on loan.
Full-size image (24 K) 
Fig. 16. Effect of storage hours on cost of generation.
Full-size image (29 K) 
Fig. 17. Comparison of bid price and calculated price by our model 
by Pranesh Krishnamurthya, Shreya Mishrab, Rangan Banerjeea, Corresponding author contact information, E-mail the corresponding author  
a Department of Energy Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India  
b Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India 
Energy Policy via Elsevier Science Direct www.ScienceDirect.com 
Volume 48, September 2012, Pages 407–419
Keywords: Solar thermal, Parabolic trough, Cost analysis

No comments:

Post a Comment