Abstract: This
paper describes and implements a method for valuing a time-varying
local public good: air quality. It models survey respondents'
self-reported happiness as a function of their demographic
characteristics, incomes, and the air pollution and weather on the date
and in the place they were surveyed. People with higher incomes report
higher levels of happiness, and people interviewed on days with worse
local air pollution report lower levels of happiness. Combining these
two concepts, I derive the average marginal rate of substitution between
income and current air quality — a compensating differential for
short-term changes in air pollution.
Highlights
►
I present a method for valuing a time-varying local public good: air
quality.
► People interviewed on days with worse local air pollution report lower happiness.
► People with higher incomes report higher levels of happiness.
► Together these two concepts yield the tradeoff between income and air quality.
► A one standard deviation drop in air quality makes people worse off by about $40.
► People interviewed on days with worse local air pollution report lower happiness.
► People with higher incomes report higher levels of happiness.
► Together these two concepts yield the tradeoff between income and air quality.
► A one standard deviation drop in air quality makes people worse off by about $40.
by Arik Levinson , Georgetown University and NBER
Journal of Public Economics via Elsevier Science Direct www.ScienceDirect.com
Volume 96, Issues 9–10; October, 2012; Pages 869–880
Keywords: Willingness to pay; Stated well-being; Pollution; Compensating differential
No comments:
Post a Comment